[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wimOSd-41nDAYKfbUCNN=o22NOrGT6U38=KLqw5NBsZNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 13:06:37 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] epoll: fix compat syscall wire up of epoll_pwait2
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 12:14 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> The sigset_t argument is actually compatible between x86-32 and x86-64
Well, random high bits in size_t or the pointer value aren't. So it
still looks a bit iffy to me.
But it might end up working almost by accident.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists