[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <TY2PR01MB3692BC2020ABED197CF63074D8DF0@TY2PR01MB3692.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 10:49:31 +0000
From: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Khiem Nguyen <khiem.nguyen.xt@...esas.com>,
linux-power <linux-power@...rohmeurope.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 12/12] mfd: bd9571mwv: Add support for BD9574MWF
Hi Geert-san,
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven, Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2020 6:32 PM
<snip>
> > Also, I think I should remove the following patch.
> >
> > [PATCH v4 08/12] gpio: bd9571mwv: Add BD9574MWF support
>
> You mean removing the chip types from bd9571mwv_gpio_id_table[]?
> You still need the "bd9574mwf-gpio" entry, don't you?
You're correct. The MFD driver uses "bd9574mwf-gpio". And,
"bd9574mwf-gpio" with 0 is not good. So, I'll keep this patch.
Thank you for the point it out.
Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
Powered by blists - more mailing lists