[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201222162509.GB3248@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 11:25:09 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org, jlayton@...nel.org,
amir73il@...il.com, sargun@...gun.me, miklos@...redi.hu,
jack@...e.cz, neilb@...e.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, hch@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] vfs: Add a super block operation to check for
writeback errors
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 04:19:00PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 02:50:54PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > - ret2 = errseq_check_and_advance(&sb->s_wb_err, &f.file->f_sb_err);
> > + if (sb->s_op->errseq_check_advance)
> > + ret2 = sb->s_op->errseq_check_advance(sb, f.file);
>
> What a terrible name for an fs operation. You don't seem to be able
> to distinguish between semantics and implementation. How about
> check_error()?
check_error() sounds better. I was not very happy with the name either.
Thought of starting with something.
Vivek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists