lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b71fcc6f-bb07-f02d-8e1e-79fe4f5802dc@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Dec 2020 09:38:46 -0800
From:   Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc:     james.bottomley@...senpartnership.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, brking@...ux.ibm.com,
        clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ibmvfc: use correlation token to tag commands

On 12/21/20 10:24 PM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:50:31PM -0600, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
>> The vfcFrame correlation field is 64bit handle that is intended to trace
>> I/O operations through both the client stack and VIOS stack when the
>> underlying physical FC adapter supports tagging.
>>
>> Tag vfcFrames with the associated ibmvfc_event pointer handle.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
>> index 0cab4b852b48..3922441a117d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
>> @@ -1693,6 +1693,8 @@ static int ibmvfc_queuecommand_lck(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd,
>>  		vfc_cmd->iu.pri_task_attr = IBMVFC_SIMPLE_TASK;
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	vfc_cmd->correlation = cpu_to_be64(evt);
>> +
>>  	if (likely(!(rc = ibmvfc_map_sg_data(cmnd, evt, vfc_cmd, vhost->dev))))
>>  		return ibmvfc_send_event(evt, vhost, 0);
>>  
>> @@ -2370,6 +2372,8 @@ static int ibmvfc_abort_task_set(struct scsi_device *sdev)
>>  		tmf->iu.tmf_flags = IBMVFC_ABORT_TASK_SET;
>>  		evt->sync_iu = &rsp_iu;
>>  
>> +		tmf->correlation = cpu_to_be64(evt);
>> +
>>  		init_completion(&evt->comp);
>>  		rsp_rc = ibmvfc_send_event(evt, vhost, default_timeout);
>>  	}
>> -- 
>> 2.27.0
>>
> 
> This patch introduces a clang warning, is this intentional behavior?

Nope, I just missed the required cast. I've got a fixes patch queued up. I just
haven't sent it yet.

-Tyrel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ