linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/48] Introduce core voltage scaling for NVIDIA Tegra20/30 SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6281108a-5d76-bf6e-13ea-e27808c829b9@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Dec 2020 22:14:35 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
        Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/48] Introduce core voltage scaling for NVIDIA
 Tegra20/30 SoCs

22.12.2020 12:15, Viresh Kumar пишет:
> On 18-12-20, 16:51, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Alright, although I haven't pretended that v2 patches should be merged
>> right away since they are fundamentally different from v1, and thus, all
>> patches need to be reviewed first.
> 
> I agree. I have done some basic review for the stuff.

Thank you for the review.

>> If the current OPP changes look good to you, then please give yours r-b
>> to the patches. Thanks in advance!
> 
> r-b-y isn't required as they will go through my tree itself. So if everyone is
> happy with the idea, please submit the patches separately (fixes, improvements,
> devm_*, etc).

okay