[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a347c8f2a76fc80551a3dfcb66b0eec9b024a90.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 14:45:05 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>,
bauerman@...ux.ibm.com, robh@...nel.org,
takahiro.akashi@...aro.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
will@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com, mpe@...erman.id.au
Cc: james.morse@....com, sashal@...nel.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
paulus@...ba.org, frowand.list@...il.com,
vincenzo.frascino@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
pasha.tatashin@...een.com, allison@...utok.net,
masahiroy@...nel.org, bhsharma@...hat.com, mbrugger@...e.com,
hsinyi@...omium.org, tao.li@...o.com, christophe.leroy@....fr,
prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com, balajib@...ux.microsoft.com,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 2/6] powerpc: Move arch independent ima kexec
functions to drivers/of/kexec.c
On Tue, 2020-12-22 at 10:53 -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> On 12/22/20 6:26 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>
> Hi Mimi,
>
> >
> > On Sat, 2020-12-19 at 09:57 -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile
> >> index 4aff6846c772..b6c52608cb49 100644
> >> --- a/arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile
> >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile
> >> @@ -9,13 +9,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PPC32) += relocate_32.o
> >>
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE) += file_load.o ranges.o file_load_$(BITS).o elf_$(BITS).o
> >>
> >> -ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC
> >> -ifdef CONFIG_IMA
> >> -obj-y += ima.o
> >> -endif
> >> -endif
> >
> > Notice how "kexec/ima.o" is only included if the architecture supports
> > it and IMA is configured. In addition only if CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC is
> > configured, is the IMA measurement list carried across kexec. After
> > moving the rest of ima.c to drivers/of/kexec.c, this changes. Notice
> > how drivers/of/Kconfig includes kexec.o:
> >
> > obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE) += kexec.o
> >
> > It is not dependent on CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC. Shouldn't all of the
> > functions defined in ima.c being moved to kexec.o be defined within a
> > CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC ifdef?
> >
>
> Thanks for reviewing the changes.
>
> In "drivers/of/kexec.c" the function remove_ima_buffer() is defined
> under "#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC"
>
> setup_ima_buffer() is defined under "#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC" - the same
> way it was defined in "arch/powerpc/kexec/ima.c".
>
> As you know, CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC depends on CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC (as
> defined in "security/integrity/ima/Kconfig").
>
> ima_get_kexec_buffer() and ima_free_kexec_buffer() are unconditionally
> defined in "drivers/of/kexec.c" even though they are called only when
> CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC is enabled. I will update these two functions to
> be moved under "#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC"
The issue is the reverse. CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC may be enabled without
CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC being enabled. This allows the architecture to
support carrying the measurement list across kexec, but requires
enabling it at build time.
Only if CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC is enabled should any of these functions
be compiled at build. This allows restoring the previous IMA
measurement list, even if CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC is not enabled.
Only if CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC is enabled, should carrying the measurement
list across kexec be enabled. See how arch_ima_add_kexec_buffer,
write_number, setup_ima_buffer are ifdef'ed in
arch/powerpc/kexec/ima.c.
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists