[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201222210345.2275038-1-ndesaulniers@google.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 13:03:45 -0800
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fs: binfmt_em86: check return code of remove_arg_zero
remove_arg_zero is declared as __must_check. Looks like it can return
-EFAULT on failure.
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
---
fs/binfmt_em86.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/binfmt_em86.c b/fs/binfmt_em86.c
index 06b9b9fddf70..6e98fcfca66e 100644
--- a/fs/binfmt_em86.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_em86.c
@@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ static int load_em86(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
* This is done in reverse order, because of how the
* user environment and arguments are stored.
*/
- remove_arg_zero(bprm);
+ retval = remove_arg_zero(bprm);
+ if (retval < 0) return retval;
retval = copy_string_kernel(bprm->filename, bprm);
if (retval < 0) return retval;
bprm->argc++;
--
2.29.2.729.g45daf8777d-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists