lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 22 Dec 2020 14:55:28 -0800
From:   Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Liang Li <liliangleo@...iglobal.com>,
        Liang Li <liliang324@...il.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm: support hugetlb free page reporting

On 12/22/20 11:59 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 11:47 PM Liang Li <liliang.opensource@...il.com> wrote:
>> +
>> +       if (huge_page_order(h) > MAX_ORDER)
>> +               budget = HUGEPAGE_REPORTING_CAPACITY;
>> +       else
>> +               budget = HUGEPAGE_REPORTING_CAPACITY * 32;
> 
> Wouldn't huge_page_order always be more than MAX_ORDER? Seems like we
> don't even really need budget since this should probably be pulling
> out no more than one hugepage at a time.

On standard x86_64 configs, 2MB huge pages are of order 9 < MAX_ORDER (11).
What is important for hugetlb is the largest order that can be allocated
from buddy.  Anything bigger is considered a gigantic page and has to be
allocated differently.

If the code above is trying to distinguish between huge and gigantic pages,
it is off by 1.  The largest order that can be allocated from the buddy is
(MAX_ORDER - 1).  So, the check should be '>='.

-- 
Mike Kravetz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ