lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201223183314.GF2657@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date:   Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:33:14 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rcu:rcu/test 136/143] kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:2696:25: error:
 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'on_cpu'

On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 11:28:58PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git rcu/test
> head:   4c4c8e04a7f8522de634aa062f4cd6b8b80c151b
> commit: 72351a864d02b480a5c237144033e21be816f29f [136/143] fixup! rcu/nocb: Add grace period and task state to show_rcu_nocb_state() output
> config: nds32-randconfig-r014-20201221 (attached as .config)
> compiler: nds32le-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git/commit/?id=72351a864d02b480a5c237144033e21be816f29f
>         git remote add rcu https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git
>         git fetch --no-tags rcu rcu/test
>         git checkout 72351a864d02b480a5c237144033e21be816f29f
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=nds32 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:16,
>                     from kernel/rcu/tree.c:21:
>    kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h: In function 'show_rcu_nocb_gp_state':
> >> kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:2696:25: error: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'on_cpu'
>     2696 |    !rdp->nocb_cb_kthread->on_cpu ? "!" : "");
>          |                         ^~
>    include/linux/printk.h:373:34: note: in definition of macro 'pr_info'
>      373 |  printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
>          |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~
>    kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h: In function 'show_rcu_nocb_state':
>    kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:2737:25: error: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'on_cpu'
>     2737 |    !rdp->nocb_cb_kthread->on_cpu ? "!" : "");
>          |                         ^~
>    include/linux/printk.h:373:34: note: in definition of macro 'pr_info'
>      373 |  printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
>          |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~

Good catch, I missed the case of !SMP and rcu_nocbs CPUs, thank you!

Does the following fix this for you?  (To be folded into the original
with attribution.)

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 2c16fa8..f97c991 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -2668,6 +2668,19 @@ void rcu_bind_current_to_nocb(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_bind_current_to_nocb);
 
+// The ->on_cpu field is available only in CONFIG_SMP=y, so...
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static char *show_rcu_should_be_on_cpu(struct task_struct *tsp)
+{
+	return tsp && tsp->state == TASK_RUNNING && !tsp->on_cpu ? "!" : "";
+}
+#else // #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static char *show_rcu_should_be_on_cpu(struct task_struct *tsp)
+{
+	return "";
+}
+#endif // #else #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+
 /*
  * Dump out nocb grace-period kthread state for the specified rcu_data
  * structure.
@@ -2693,8 +2706,7 @@ static void show_rcu_nocb_gp_state(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 		rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi, READ_ONCE(rdp->nocb_gp_loops),
 		rdp->nocb_gp_kthread ? task_state_to_char(rdp->nocb_gp_kthread) : '.',
 		rdp->nocb_cb_kthread ? (int)task_cpu(rdp->nocb_gp_kthread) : -1,
-		rdp->nocb_cb_kthread && rdp->nocb_cb_kthread->state == TASK_RUNNING &&
-			!rdp->nocb_cb_kthread->on_cpu ? "!" : "");
+		show_rcu_should_be_on_cpu(rdp->nocb_cb_kthread));
 }
 
 /* Dump out nocb kthread state for the specified rcu_data structure. */
@@ -2734,8 +2746,7 @@ static void show_rcu_nocb_state(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 		rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist),
 		rdp->nocb_cb_kthread ? task_state_to_char(rdp->nocb_cb_kthread) : '.',
 		rdp->nocb_cb_kthread ? (int)task_cpu(rdp->nocb_gp_kthread) : -1,
-		rdp->nocb_cb_kthread && rdp->nocb_cb_kthread->state == TASK_RUNNING &&
-			!rdp->nocb_cb_kthread->on_cpu ? "!" : "");
+		show_rcu_should_be_on_cpu(rdp->nocb_cb_kthread));
 
 	/* It is OK for GP kthreads to have GP state. */
 	if (rdp->nocb_gp_rdp == rdp)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ