[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201223192441.GH3198262@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 20:24:41 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: macb: Correct usage of MACB_CAPS_CLK_HW_CHG flag on
Zynq
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 06:41:44PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
> A new flag MACB_CAPS_CLK_HW_CHG was added and all callers of
> macb_set_tx_clk were gated on the presence of this flag.
>
> if (!bp->tx_clk || !(bp->caps & MACB_CAPS_CLK_HW_CHG))
>
> However the flag was not added to anything other than the new
> sama7g5_gem, turning that function call into a no op for all other
> systems. This breaks the networking on Zynq.
I'm not sure this is the correct fix. I think the original patch might
be broken. Look at the commit message wording:
The patch adds a new
capability so that macb_set_tx_clock() to not be called for IPs having
this capability
So MACB_CAPS_CLK_HW_CHG disables something, not enables it. So i
suspect this if statement is wrong and needs fixing.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists