linux-kernel - [PATCH] ata: ahci_brcm: Add back regulators management

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201223224130.738590-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Dec 2020 14:41:29 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk
Cc:     bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org (open list:LIBATA SUBSYSTEM (Serial and
        Parallel ATA drivers))
Subject: [PATCH] ata: ahci_brcm: Add back regulators management

While reworking the resources management and departing from using
ahci_platform_enable_resources() which did not allow a proper step
separation like we need, we unfortunately lost the ability to control
AHCI regulators. This broke some Broadcom STB systems that do expect
regulators to be turned on to link up with attached hard drives.

Fixes: c0cdf2ac4b5b ("ata: ahci_brcm: Fix AHCI resources management")
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
---
Jens,

This is based on your for-next branch, let me know if you need me to
rebase to a different branch. Thanks!

 drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c
index 49f7acbfcf01..5b32df5d33ad 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c
@@ -377,6 +377,10 @@ static int __maybe_unused brcm_ahci_resume(struct device *dev)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	ret = ahci_platform_enable_regulators(hpriv);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_disable_clks;
+
 	brcm_sata_init(priv);
 	brcm_sata_phys_enable(priv);
 	brcm_sata_alpm_init(hpriv);
@@ -406,6 +410,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused brcm_ahci_resume(struct device *dev)
 	ahci_platform_disable_phys(hpriv);
 out_disable_phys:
 	brcm_sata_phys_disable(priv);
+	ahci_platform_disable_regulators(hpriv);
+out_disable_clks:
 	ahci_platform_disable_clks(hpriv);
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -490,6 +496,10 @@ static int brcm_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ret)
 		goto out_reset;
 
+	ret = ahci_platform_enable_regulators(hpriv);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_disable_clks;
+
 	/* Must be first so as to configure endianness including that
 	 * of the standard AHCI register space.
 	 */
@@ -499,7 +509,7 @@ static int brcm_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	priv->port_mask = brcm_ahci_get_portmask(hpriv, priv);
 	if (!priv->port_mask) {
 		ret = -ENODEV;
-		goto out_disable_clks;
+		goto out_disable_regulators;
 	}
 
 	/* Must be done before ahci_platform_enable_phys() */
@@ -524,6 +534,8 @@ static int brcm_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	ahci_platform_disable_phys(hpriv);
 out_disable_phys:
 	brcm_sata_phys_disable(priv);
+out_disable_regulators:
+	ahci_platform_disable_regulators(hpriv);
 out_disable_clks:
 	ahci_platform_disable_clks(hpriv);
 out_reset:
-- 
2.25.1