[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <caf829a6-4d88-d932-f1cb-7dc16817719d@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 20:56:45 -0800
From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: zohar@...ux.ibm.com, robh@...nel.org, takahiro.akashi@...aro.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, will@...nel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, mpe@...erman.id.au, james.morse@....com,
sashal@...nel.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
frowand.list@...il.com, vincenzo.frascino@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, jmorris@...ei.org,
serge@...lyn.com, pasha.tatashin@...een.com, allison@...utok.net,
masahiroy@...nel.org, bhsharma@...hat.com, mbrugger@...e.com,
hsinyi@...omium.org, tao.li@...o.com, christophe.leroy@....fr,
prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com, balajib@...ux.microsoft.com,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 2/6] powerpc: Move arch independent ima kexec
functions to drivers/of/kexec.c
On 12/22/20 4:48 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>
> Actually, I have one more comment on this patch:
>
> Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com> writes:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load.c b/arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load.c
>> index 956bcb2d1ec2..9f3ec0b239ef 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load.c
>> @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
>> #include <linux/of_fdt.h>
>> #include <linux/libfdt.h>
>> #include <asm/setup.h>
>> -#include <asm/ima.h>
>>
>> #define SLAVE_CODE_SIZE 256 /* First 0x100 bytes */
>>
>> @@ -163,12 +162,6 @@ int setup_new_fdt(const struct kimage *image, void *fdt,
>> if (ret)
>> goto err;
>>
>> - ret = setup_ima_buffer(image, fdt, fdt_path_offset(fdt, "/chosen"));
>> - if (ret) {
>> - pr_err("Error setting up the new device tree.\n");
>> - return ret;
>> - }
>> -
>> return 0;
>>
>> err:
>
> With this change, setup_new_fdt() is nothing more than a call to
> of_kexec_setup_new_fdt(). It should be removed, and its caller should
> call of_kexec_setup_new_fdt() directly.
>
> This change could be done in patch 4 of this series, to keep this patch
> simpler.
>
Sure Thiago - I will make that change.
thanks,
-lakshmi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists