[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201223080537.GA4974@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 09:05:37 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: DM's filesystem lookup in dm_get_dev_t() [was: Re: linux-next:
manual merge of the device-mapper tree with Linus' tree]
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 06:24:09PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Ok. The problem from my perspective is that device-mapper needs to
> a) ensure that the arbitrary string passed in with the table definition
> refers to a valid block device
> and
> b) the block device can be opened with O_EXCL, so that device-mapper can
> then use it.
>
> Originally (ie prior to commit 644bda6f3460) dm_get_device() just converted
> the string to a 'dev_t' representation, and then the block device itself
> was checked and opened in dm_get_table_device().
> 'lookup_bdev' was just being used to convert the path if the string was not
> in the canonical major:minor format, as then it was assumed that it
> referred to a block device node, and then lookup_bdev kinda makes sense.
Yes, 644bda6f3460 is the cause of all evil, as it uses an API in a place
where it should not be used. It and the prep patch
(e6e20a7a5f3f49bfee518d5c6849107398d83912) which did the grave mistake
of making name_to_dev_t available outside of the early init code really
need to be reverted.
> However, lookup_bdev() now always recurses into the filesystem, causing
> multipath to stall in an all-paths-down scenario.
lookup_bdev always did a file system lookup, and always only accepted
a valid name in the file system.
> Alternatively, if Mike says that only major:minor is the valid format for a
> table definition we can kill that code completely. But clearly _I_ cannot
> make the call here.
Before 644bda6f3460 the table definitions only accepted a valid name in
the file system. Which is the proper interface.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists