linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] scsi: ufs: Add "wb_on" sysfs node to control WB on/off

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9ac61bb53d1f33797107577f66aefe95e3e35bb9.camel@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Dec 2020 09:28:45 +0100
From:   Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
To:     Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
        avri.altman@....com, asutoshd@...eaurora.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, beanhuo@...ron.com, bvanassche@....org,
        tomas.winkler@...el.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] scsi: ufs: Add "wb_on" sysfs node to control WB
 on/off

On Wed, 2020-12-23 at 09:31 +0800, Can Guo wrote:
> I don't see why removing the sysfs nodes during ufshcd_shutdown() is
> a
> concern to customer - we should do whatever is needed to protect LLD
> contexts from user space intervene. What do you think?

The sysfs nodes can be removed only when the device is remvoed.

Bean