[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35876d6b-f5bd-daed-f2e3-cb78e9bc8206@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 16:02:03 +0100
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>, kvalo@...eaurora.org,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] intel/iwlwifi: use DEFINE_MUTEX (and mutex_init()
had been too late)
On 23.12.2020 15:11, Zheng Yongjun wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-drv.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-drv.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-drv.c
> index 9dcd2e990c9c..71119044382f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-drv.c
> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ enum {
> };
>
> /* Protects the table contents, i.e. the ops pointer & drv list */
> -static struct mutex iwlwifi_opmode_table_mtx;
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(iwlwifi_opmode_table_mtx);
> static struct iwlwifi_opmode_table {
> const char *name; /* name: iwldvm, iwlmvm, etc */
> const struct iwl_op_mode_ops *ops; /* pointer to op_mode ops */
> @@ -1786,8 +1786,6 @@ static int __init iwl_drv_init(void)
> {
> int i, err;
>
> - mutex_init(&iwlwifi_opmode_table_mtx);
> -
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(iwlwifi_opmode_table); i++)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&iwlwifi_opmode_table[i].drv);
>
>
The change itself is ok, but:
- commit message is missing (did you run checkpatch?)
- Why should the current mutex_init() call be too late?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists