| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <X+SPsks5itN9OFqB@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 14:55:14 +0200
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
devel@...ica.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@...el.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
Tian Shu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@...el.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@...el.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se,
Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>,
"Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/14] software_node: Add support for fwnode_graph*()
family of functions
Hi Andy,
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 02:24:12PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 3:14 AM Daniel Scally wrote:
> >
> > From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > This implements the remaining .graph_* callbacks in the
>
> .graph_* ==> ->graph_*() ?
>
> > fwnode operations structure for the software nodes. That makes
> > the fwnode_graph*() functions available in the drivers also
>
> graph*() -> graph_*() ?
>
> > when software nodes are used.
> >
> > The implementation tries to mimic the "OF graph" as much as
> > possible, but there is no support for the "reg" device
> > property. The ports will need to have the index in their
> > name which starts with "port@" (for example "port@0", "port@1",
>
> > ...)
>
> Looks not good, perhaps move to the previous line, or move port@1 example here?
>
> > and endpoints will use the index of the software node
> > that is given to them during creation. The port nodes can
> > also be grouped under a specially named "ports" subnode,
> > just like in DT, if necessary.
> >
> > The remote-endpoints are reference properties under the
> > endpoint nodes that are named "remote-endpoint".
>
> Few nitpicks here and there, after addressing them,
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3
> > - Changed software_node_get_next_endpoint() to drop the variable
> > named "old"
> > - Used the macros defined in 06/14 instead of magic numbers
> > - Added some comments to explain behaviour a little where it's unclear
> >
> > drivers/base/swnode.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/swnode.c b/drivers/base/swnode.c
> > index 2d07eb04c6c8..ff690029060d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/swnode.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/swnode.c
> > @@ -540,6 +540,112 @@ software_node_get_reference_args(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static struct fwnode_handle *
> > +swnode_graph_find_next_port(const struct fwnode_handle *parent,
> > + struct fwnode_handle *port)
> > +{
> > + struct fwnode_handle *old = port;
> > +
> > + while ((port = software_node_get_next_child(parent, old))) {
> > + /*
> > + * ports have naming style "port@n", so we search for children
> > + * that follow that convention (but without assuming anything
> > + * about the index number)
> > + */
>
> > + if (!strncmp(to_swnode(port)->node->name, "port@",
>
> You may use here corresponding _FMT macro.
>
> > + FWNODE_GRAPH_PORT_NAME_PREFIX_LEN))
> > + return port;
> > + old = port;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct fwnode_handle *
> > +software_node_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> > + struct fwnode_handle *endpoint)
> > +{
> > + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode);
> > + struct fwnode_handle *parent;
> > + struct fwnode_handle *port;
> > +
> > + if (!swnode)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + if (endpoint) {
> > + port = software_node_get_parent(endpoint);
> > + parent = software_node_get_parent(port);
> > + } else {
> > + parent = software_node_get_named_child_node(fwnode, "ports");
> > + if (!parent)
> > + parent = software_node_get(&swnode->fwnode);
> > +
> > + port = swnode_graph_find_next_port(parent, NULL);
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (; port; port = swnode_graph_find_next_port(parent, port)) {
> > + endpoint = software_node_get_next_child(port, endpoint);
> > + if (endpoint) {
> > + fwnode_handle_put(port);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + fwnode_handle_put(parent);
> > +
> > + return endpoint;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct fwnode_handle *
> > +software_node_graph_get_remote_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > +{
> > + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode);
> > + const struct software_node_ref_args *ref;
> > + const struct property_entry *prop;
> > +
> > + if (!swnode)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + prop = property_entry_get(swnode->node->properties, "remote-endpoint");
> > + if (!prop || prop->type != DEV_PROP_REF || prop->is_inline)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + ref = prop->pointer;
> > +
> > + return software_node_get(software_node_fwnode(ref[0].node));
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct fwnode_handle *
> > +software_node_graph_get_port_parent(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > +{
> > + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode);
> > +
> > + swnode = swnode->parent;
> > + if (swnode && !strcmp(swnode->node->name, "ports"))
> > + swnode = swnode->parent;
> > +
> > + return swnode ? software_node_get(&swnode->fwnode) : NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +software_node_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> > + struct fwnode_endpoint *endpoint)
> > +{
> > + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + /* Ports have naming style "port@n", we need to select the n */
>
> > + ret = kstrtou32(swnode->parent->node->name + FWNODE_GRAPH_PORT_NAME_PREFIX_LEN,
>
> Maybe a temporary variable?
>
> unsigned int prefix_len = FWNODE_GRAPH_PORT_NAME_PREFIX_LEN;
> ...
> ret = kstrtou32(swnode->parent->node->name + prefix_len,
Honestly I'm wondering if those macros don't hinder readability. I'd
rather write
+ strlen("port@")
and let the compiler optimize this to a compile-time constant.
> > + 10, &endpoint->port);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + endpoint->id = swnode->id;
> > + endpoint->local_fwnode = fwnode;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct fwnode_operations software_node_ops = {
> > .get = software_node_get,
> > .put = software_node_put,
> > @@ -551,7 +657,11 @@ static const struct fwnode_operations software_node_ops = {
> > .get_parent = software_node_get_parent,
> > .get_next_child_node = software_node_get_next_child,
> > .get_named_child_node = software_node_get_named_child_node,
> > - .get_reference_args = software_node_get_reference_args
> > + .get_reference_args = software_node_get_reference_args,
> > + .graph_get_next_endpoint = software_node_graph_get_next_endpoint,
> > + .graph_get_remote_endpoint = software_node_graph_get_remote_endpoint,
> > + .graph_get_port_parent = software_node_graph_get_port_parent,
> > + .graph_parse_endpoint = software_node_graph_parse_endpoint,
> > };
> >
> > /* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists