[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d47e0ccf-9def-e9c9-fdfb-390ad5d2ee5e@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 14:21:15 +0000
From: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
devel@...ica.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@...el.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
Tian Shu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@...el.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@...el.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se,
Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>,
"Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/14] software_node: Add support for fwnode_graph*()
family of functions
Hi Andy, Laurent
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 2:55 PM Laurent Pinchart
> <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 02:24:12PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 3:14 AM Daniel Scally wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>>> + if (!strncmp(to_swnode(port)->node->name, "port@",
>>>
>>> You may use here corresponding _FMT macro.
>>>
>>>> + FWNODE_GRAPH_PORT_NAME_PREFIX_LEN))
>>>> + return port;
>
> ...
>
>>>> + /* Ports have naming style "port@n", we need to select the n */
>>>
>>>> + ret = kstrtou32(swnode->parent->node->name + FWNODE_GRAPH_PORT_NAME_PREFIX_LEN,
>>>
>>> Maybe a temporary variable?
>>>
>>> unsigned int prefix_len = FWNODE_GRAPH_PORT_NAME_PREFIX_LEN;
>>> ...
>>> ret = kstrtou32(swnode->parent->node->name + prefix_len,
>>
>> Honestly I'm wondering if those macros don't hinder readability. I'd
>> rather write
>>
>> + strlen("port@")
>
> Works for me, since the compiler optimizes this away to be a plain constant.
Well, how about instead of the LEN macro, we have:
#define FWNODE_GRAPH_PORT_NAME_PREFIX "port@"
#define FWNODE_GRAPH_PORT_NAME_FMT FWNODE_GRAPH_PORT_NAME_PREFIX "%u"
And then it's still maintainable in one place but (I think) slightly
less clunky, since we can do strlen(FWNODE_GRAPH_PORT_NAME_PREFIX)
Or we can do strlen("port@"), I'm good either way :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists