lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAOTY_9e9qadeO9k7zQnvSLZAAJFxjWwYSBz-XXEUUh16jsptA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Dec 2020 22:28:35 +0800
From:   Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
To:     Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2, 3/3] mailbox: cmdq: add mt8192 support

Hi, Yongqiang:

Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com> 於 2020年12月24日 週四 上午8:55寫道:
>
> add mt8192 support
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> index 75378e3..7f243e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> @@ -607,6 +607,7 @@ static int cmdq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         {.compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-gce", .data = (void *)&gce_plat_v2},
>         {.compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-gce", .data = (void *)&gce_plat_v3},
>         {.compatible = "mediatek,mt6779-gce", .data = (void *)&gce_plat_v4},
> +       {.compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-gce", .data = (void *)&gce_plat_v4},

In the view of hardware function, is mt8192-gce identical to
mt6779-gce? If these two are identical, you need not to modify driver,
and the compatible should be

compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-gce", "mediatek,mt6779-gce";

If they are not identical, what's the different?

Regards,
Chun-Kuang.

>         {}
>  };
>
> --
> 1.8.1.1.dirty
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ