[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93dc6912192df78026f8f98c8f6ab67608c188f0.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 09:41:48 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@...ux.microsoft.com>,
stephen.smalley.work@...il.com, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...hat.com, gmazyland@...il.com,
paul@...l-moore.com
Cc: tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com, sashal@...nel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
nramas@...ux.microsoft.com, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
selinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/8] IMA: define a builtin critical data measurement
policy
On Sat, 2020-12-12 at 10:02 -0800, Tushar Sugandhi wrote:
> From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
>
> Define a new critical data builtin policy to allow measuring
> early kernel integrity critical data before a custom IMA policy
> is loaded.
>
> Add critical data to built-in IMA rules if the kernel command line
> contains "ima_policy=critical_data".
This sentence isn't really necessary.
>
> Update the documentation on kernel parameters to document
> the new critical data builtin policy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
thanks,
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists