linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] powercap/dtpm: Add the DTPM framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 Dec 2020 19:46:11 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>,
        Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
        Ram Chandrasekar <rkumbako@...eaurora.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] powercap/dtpm: Add the DTPM framework

Hi!

> The density of components greatly increased the last decade bringing a
> numerous number of heating sources which are monitored by more than 20
> sensors on recent SoC. The skin temperature, which is the case
> temperature of the device, must stay below approximately 45°C in order
> to comply with the legal requirements.

What kind of device is that?

Does that mean that running fsck is now "illegal" because temperature
will not be managed during that time?
							Pavel
-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)