lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 19:46:11 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
Ram Chandrasekar <rkumbako@...eaurora.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] powercap/dtpm: Add the DTPM framework
Hi!
> The density of components greatly increased the last decade bringing a
> numerous number of heating sources which are monitored by more than 20
> sensors on recent SoC. The skin temperature, which is the case
> temperature of the device, must stay below approximately 45°C in order
> to comply with the legal requirements.
What kind of device is that?
Does that mean that running fsck is now "illegal" because temperature
will not be managed during that time?
Pavel
--
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists