| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <28e8b1cf-513a-5bc6-096d-432dfa6620cb@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 10:11:40 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vhost/vsock: add IOTLB API support
On 2020/12/23 下午10:36, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> This patch enables the IOTLB API support for vhost-vsock devices,
> allowing the userspace to emulate an IOMMU for the guest.
>
> These changes were made following vhost-net, in details this patch:
> - exposes VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM feature and inits the iotlb
> device if the feature is acked
> - implements VHOST_GET_BACKEND_FEATURES and
> VHOST_SET_BACKEND_FEATURES ioctls
> - calls vq_meta_prefetch() before vq processing to prefetch vq
> metadata address in IOTLB
> - provides .read_iter, .write_iter, and .poll callbacks for the
> chardev; they are used by the userspace to exchange IOTLB messages
>
> This patch was tested specifying "intel_iommu=strict" in the guest
> kernel command line. I used QEMU with a patch applied [1] to fix a
> simple issue (that patch was merged in QEMU v5.2.0):
> $ qemu -M q35,accel=kvm,kernel-irqchip=split \
> -drive file=fedora.qcow2,format=qcow2,if=virtio \
> -device intel-iommu,intremap=on,device-iotlb=on \
> -device vhost-vsock-pci,guest-cid=3,iommu_platform=on,ats=on
>
> [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-10/msg09077.html
>
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> ---
>
> The patch is the same of v1, but I re-tested it with:
> - QEMU v5.2.0-551-ga05f8ecd88
> - Linux 5.9.15 (host)
> - Linux 5.9.15 and 5.10.0 (guest)
> Now, enabling 'ats' it works well, there are just a few simple changes.
>
> v1: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg3716022.html
> v2:
> - updated commit message about QEMU version and string used to test
> - rebased on mst/vhost branch
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> index a483cec31d5c..5e78fb719602 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,12 @@
> #define VHOST_VSOCK_PKT_WEIGHT 256
>
> enum {
> - VHOST_VSOCK_FEATURES = VHOST_FEATURES,
> + VHOST_VSOCK_FEATURES = VHOST_FEATURES |
> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM)
> +};
> +
> +enum {
> + VHOST_VSOCK_BACKEND_FEATURES = (1ULL << VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_MSG_V2)
> };
>
> /* Used to track all the vhost_vsock instances on the system. */
> @@ -94,6 +99,9 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
> if (!vhost_vq_get_backend(vq))
> goto out;
>
> + if (!vq_meta_prefetch(vq))
> + goto out;
> +
> /* Avoid further vmexits, we're already processing the virtqueue */
> vhost_disable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq);
>
> @@ -449,6 +457,9 @@ static void vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
> if (!vhost_vq_get_backend(vq))
> goto out;
>
> + if (!vq_meta_prefetch(vq))
> + goto out;
> +
> vhost_disable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq);
> do {
> u32 len;
> @@ -766,8 +777,12 @@ static int vhost_vsock_set_features(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, u64 features)
> mutex_lock(&vsock->dev.mutex);
> if ((features & (1 << VHOST_F_LOG_ALL)) &&
> !vhost_log_access_ok(&vsock->dev)) {
> - mutex_unlock(&vsock->dev.mutex);
> - return -EFAULT;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + if ((features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM))) {
> + if (vhost_init_device_iotlb(&vsock->dev, true))
> + goto err;
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vsock->vqs); i++) {
> @@ -778,6 +793,10 @@ static int vhost_vsock_set_features(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, u64 features)
> }
> mutex_unlock(&vsock->dev.mutex);
> return 0;
> +
> +err:
> + mutex_unlock(&vsock->dev.mutex);
> + return -EFAULT;
> }
>
> static long vhost_vsock_dev_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int ioctl,
> @@ -811,6 +830,18 @@ static long vhost_vsock_dev_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int ioctl,
> if (copy_from_user(&features, argp, sizeof(features)))
> return -EFAULT;
> return vhost_vsock_set_features(vsock, features);
> + case VHOST_GET_BACKEND_FEATURES:
> + features = VHOST_VSOCK_BACKEND_FEATURES;
> + if (copy_to_user(argp, &features, sizeof(features)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + return 0;
> + case VHOST_SET_BACKEND_FEATURES:
> + if (copy_from_user(&features, argp, sizeof(features)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + if (features & ~VHOST_VSOCK_BACKEND_FEATURES)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + vhost_set_backend_features(&vsock->dev, features);
> + return 0;
> default:
> mutex_lock(&vsock->dev.mutex);
> r = vhost_dev_ioctl(&vsock->dev, ioctl, argp);
> @@ -823,6 +854,34 @@ static long vhost_vsock_dev_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int ioctl,
> }
> }
>
> +static ssize_t vhost_vsock_chr_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
> +{
> + struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
> + struct vhost_vsock *vsock = file->private_data;
> + struct vhost_dev *dev = &vsock->dev;
> + int noblock = file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK;
> +
> + return vhost_chr_read_iter(dev, to, noblock);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t vhost_vsock_chr_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb,
> + struct iov_iter *from)
> +{
> + struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
> + struct vhost_vsock *vsock = file->private_data;
> + struct vhost_dev *dev = &vsock->dev;
> +
> + return vhost_chr_write_iter(dev, from);
> +}
> +
> +static __poll_t vhost_vsock_chr_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
> +{
> + struct vhost_vsock *vsock = file->private_data;
> + struct vhost_dev *dev = &vsock->dev;
> +
> + return vhost_chr_poll(file, dev, wait);
> +}
> +
> static const struct file_operations vhost_vsock_fops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .open = vhost_vsock_dev_open,
> @@ -830,6 +889,9 @@ static const struct file_operations vhost_vsock_fops = {
> .llseek = noop_llseek,
> .unlocked_ioctl = vhost_vsock_dev_ioctl,
> .compat_ioctl = compat_ptr_ioctl,
> + .read_iter = vhost_vsock_chr_read_iter,
> + .write_iter = vhost_vsock_chr_write_iter,
> + .poll = vhost_vsock_chr_poll,
> };
>
> static struct miscdevice vhost_vsock_misc = {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists