lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 23 Dec 2020 18:59:34 -0800 (PST)
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC:     linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
        lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject:     Re: [PATCH] clocksource: clint: Avoid remove __iomem in get_cycles_hi()

On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 00:23:30 PST (-0800), Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 09:32:30PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
>>
>> This cast loses the __iomem qualifier from clint_timer_val, which
>> triggers an sparse warning.
>
> I'm not a native speaker, but the subject line sounds strange to me.
> Shouldn't this be:
>
> 	"don't cast away the __iommu annotation"
>
> or something similar?

The title is also nonsense, I was probably trying to do two things at once when
I wrote this.  I'll send another one.

> Also this adds an overly long line.  Otherwise it looks fine.

Aren't we OK with lines longer than 80 characters now?  Or was that some other
project?  checkpatch doesn't complain, which I guess is why I didn't notice, so
hopefully that means I'm not crazy (though I guess the commit message and title
don't provide the best argument there... ;)).

Powered by blists - more mailing lists