[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201224042313.733960-1-liuchao173@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 12:23:13 +0800
From: Liu Chao <liuchao173@...wei.com>
To: <tglx@...utronix.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <hushiyuan@...wei.com>, <hewenliang4@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: Limit irq_calc_affinity_vectors to housekeeping CPUs
Replace the cpumask used in irq_calc_affinity_vectors from all possible
CPUs to only housekeeping CPUs.
When we have isolated CPUs used by real-time tasks, IRQs will be move to
housekeeping CPUs.
If there are too many IRQ vectors, moving the all to housekeeping CPUs may
exceed per-CPU vector limits. For example, when I only have two
housekeeping CPUs, there are dozens of IRQs on two CPUs, but actually one
IRQ per housekeeping CPU is enough.
Signed-off-by: Liu Chao <liuchao173@...wei.com>
---
kernel/irq/affinity.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/affinity.c b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
index 4d89ad4fae3b..3f22e3314e1b 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/sort.h>
+#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
static void irq_spread_init_one(struct cpumask *irqmsk, struct cpumask *nmsk,
unsigned int cpus_per_vec)
@@ -506,7 +507,8 @@ unsigned int irq_calc_affinity_vectors(unsigned int minvec, unsigned int maxvec,
set_vecs = maxvec - resv;
} else {
get_online_cpus();
- set_vecs = cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask);
+ set_vecs = cpumask_weight(
+ housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_MANAGED_IRQ));
put_online_cpus();
}
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists