lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 28 Dec 2020 13:47:38 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 460/717] s390/test_unwind: fix CALL_ON_STACK tests

From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit f22b9c219a798e1bf11110a3d2733d883e6da059 ]

The CALL_ON_STACK tests use the no_dat stack to switch to a different
stack for unwinding tests. If an interrupt or machine check happens
while using that stack, and previously being on the async stack, the
interrupt / machine check entry code (SWITCH_ASYNC) will assume that
the previous context did not use the async stack and happily use the
async stack again.

This will lead to stack corruption of the previous context.

To solve this disable both interrupts and machine checks before
switching to the no_dat stack.

Fixes: 7868249fbbc8 ("s390/test_unwind: add CALL_ON_STACK tests")
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c b/arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c
index 7c988994931f0..6bad84c372dcb 100644
--- a/arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c
+++ b/arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c
@@ -205,12 +205,15 @@ static noinline int unwindme_func3(struct unwindme *u)
 /* This function must appear in the backtrace. */
 static noinline int unwindme_func2(struct unwindme *u)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int rc;
 
 	if (u->flags & UWM_SWITCH_STACK) {
-		preempt_disable();
+		local_irq_save(flags);
+		local_mcck_disable();
 		rc = CALL_ON_STACK(unwindme_func3, S390_lowcore.nodat_stack, 1, u);
-		preempt_enable();
+		local_mcck_enable();
+		local_irq_restore(flags);
 		return rc;
 	} else {
 		return unwindme_func3(u);
-- 
2.27.0



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ