[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201228101526.GV4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 12:15:26 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: 'Daniel Scally' <djrscally@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...ica.org" <devel@...ica.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@...el.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
Tian Shu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@...el.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@...el.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
"kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com"
<kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
"niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se"
<niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>,
Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>,
"Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/14] software_node: unregister software_nodes in
reverse order
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 06:36:10PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Daniel Scally
> > Sent: 24 December 2020 14:14
> ...
> > >> The array will be unwound in reverse order (i.e. last entry first). If
> > >> any member of the array is a child of another member then the child must
> > > children ?
> >
> > Yes, you are right of course.
>
> The second 'child' is a back-reference to 'any member' so is singular
> so 'child' is correct.
> 'the child' could be replaced by 'it'
>
> You could have:
> If any members of the array are children of another member then the
> children must appear later in the list.
Works for me!
Dan, can you consider David's proposal?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists