linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 676/717] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: fix edge-trigger interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201228125053.370159550@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Dec 2020 13:51:14 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
        Stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 676/717] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: fix edge-trigger interrupts

From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>

commit 3f9bce7a22a3f8ac9d885c9d75bc45569f24ac8b upstream.

If we are using edge IRQs, new samples can arrive while processing
current interrupt since there are no hw guarantees the irq line
stays "low" long enough to properly detect the new interrupt.
In this case the new sample will be missed.
Polling FIFO status register in st_lsm6dsx_handler_thread routine
allow us to read new samples even if the interrupt arrives while
processing previous data and the timeslot where the line is "low"
is too short to be properly detected.

Fixes: 89ca88a7cdf2 ("iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: support active-low interrupts")
Fixes: 290a6ce11d93 ("iio: imu: add support to lsm6dsx driver")
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5e93cda7dc1e665f5685c53ad8e9ea71dbae782d.1605378871.git.lorenzo@kernel.org
Cc: <Stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c |   26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
@@ -2255,19 +2255,35 @@ st_lsm6dsx_report_motion_event(struct st
 static irqreturn_t st_lsm6dsx_handler_thread(int irq, void *private)
 {
 	struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw = private;
+	int fifo_len = 0, len;
 	bool event;
-	int count;
 
 	event = st_lsm6dsx_report_motion_event(hw);
 
 	if (!hw->settings->fifo_ops.read_fifo)
 		return event ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;
 
-	mutex_lock(&hw->fifo_lock);
-	count = hw->settings->fifo_ops.read_fifo(hw);
-	mutex_unlock(&hw->fifo_lock);
+	/*
+	 * If we are using edge IRQs, new samples can arrive while
+	 * processing current interrupt since there are no hw
+	 * guarantees the irq line stays "low" long enough to properly
+	 * detect the new interrupt. In this case the new sample will
+	 * be missed.
+	 * Polling FIFO status register allow us to read new
+	 * samples even if the interrupt arrives while processing
+	 * previous data and the timeslot where the line is "low" is
+	 * too short to be properly detected.
+	 */
+	do {
+		mutex_lock(&hw->fifo_lock);
+		len = hw->settings->fifo_ops.read_fifo(hw);
+		mutex_unlock(&hw->fifo_lock);
 
-	return count || event ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;
+		if (len > 0)
+			fifo_len += len;
+	} while (len > 0);
+
+	return fifo_len || event ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;
 }
 
 static int st_lsm6dsx_irq_setup(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw)