[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201228125045.924030517@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 13:48:39 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 521/717] io_uring: make ctx cancel on exit targeted to actual ctx
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
commit 00c18640c2430c4bafaaeede1f9dd6f7ec0e4b25 upstream.
Before IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_WQ, we could just cancel everything on the
io-wq when exiting. But that's not the case if they are shared, so
cancel for the specific ctx instead.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 24369c2e3bb0 ("io_uring: add io-wq workqueue sharing")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -8401,6 +8401,13 @@ static void io_ring_exit_work(struct wor
io_ring_ctx_free(ctx);
}
+static bool io_cancel_ctx_cb(struct io_wq_work *work, void *data)
+{
+ struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(work, struct io_kiocb, work);
+
+ return req->ctx == data;
+}
+
static void io_ring_ctx_wait_and_kill(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
@@ -8415,7 +8422,7 @@ static void io_ring_ctx_wait_and_kill(st
io_poll_remove_all(ctx, NULL);
if (ctx->io_wq)
- io_wq_cancel_all(ctx->io_wq);
+ io_wq_cancel_cb(ctx->io_wq, io_cancel_ctx_cb, ctx, true);
/* if we failed setting up the ctx, we might not have any rings */
io_iopoll_try_reap_events(ctx);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists