linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/453] 5.4.86-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYsAz_drXA3RJW-hZ8uAUv8AQ7X_JwmM38NSp6ERZQ8Wkg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Dec 2020 22:27:05 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/453] 5.4.86-rc1 review

On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 at 19:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.86 release.
> There are 453 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:48:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.86-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Perf build failed on stable-rc 5.4 branch.

> Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
>     libbpf: Fix BTF data layout checks and allow empty BTF

In file included from btf.c:17:0:
btf.c: In function 'btf_parse_hdr':
btf.c:104:48: error: 'struct btf' has no member named 'raw_size'; did
you mean 'data_size'?
   pr_debug("Invalid BTF total size:%u\n", btf->raw_size);
                                                ^
libbpf_internal.h:59:40: note: in definition of macro '__pr'
  libbpf_print(level, "libbpf: " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
                                        ^~~~~~~~~~~
btf.c:104:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_debug'
   pr_debug("Invalid BTF total size:%u\n", btf->raw_size);
   ^~~~~~~~

Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>

Full log link,
https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-stable-rc-5.4/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=intel-corei7-64,label=docker-buster-lkft/346/consoleText


-- 
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org