linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 05/14] software_node: unregister software

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201228174744.GB4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Dec 2020 19:47:44 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        devel@...ica.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, yong.zhi@...el.com,
        bingbu.cao@...el.com, tian.shu.qiu@...el.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
        robert.moore@...el.com, erik.kaneda@...el.com, pmladek@...e.com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com,
        linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
        laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com,
        jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org, kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com,
        hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl, m.felsch@...gutronix.de,
        niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se, slongerbeam@...il.com,
        heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/14] software_node: unregister software_nodes in
 reverse order

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 06:34:10PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 01:08:58AM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:

...

> >  void software_node_unregister_node_group(const struct software_node **node_group)
> 
> With this line wrapped,

Why? It's only one character behind 80 and wrapping it will decrease
readability. Moreover, documentation has explicit exceptions for such cases.


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko