lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 28 Dec 2020 23:37:26 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] kernel.h: Drop unneeded <linux/kernel.h> inclusion
 from other headers

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 01:06:06PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 08:33:56AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 07:28:26PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > There is no evidence we need kernel.h inclusion in certain headers.
> > 
> > Did you run some tools to determine this or is it just a hunch?
> 
> I read files manually. So, closer to the latter.
> Also I rely on 0day and other CIs that didn't show anything for a long time.

Will, any recommendation what should I run to be solid about this change?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists