lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 10:21:31 +0530 From: Vijayanand Jitta <vjitta@...eaurora.org> To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>, dan.j.williams@...el.com, broonie@...nel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>, qcai@...hat.com, ylal@...eaurora.org, vinmenon@...eaurora.org, kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] lib: stackdepot: Add support to configure STACK_HASH_SIZE On 12/23/2020 8:10 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote: >> >> Michan, We would still need config option so that we can reduce the >> memory consumption on low ram devices using config. >> >> Alex, On this, >> "I also suppose device vendors may prefer setting a fixed (maybe >> non-default) hash size for low-memory devices rather than letting the >> admins increase it." >> I see kernel param swiotlb does similar thing i.e; '0' to disable and >> set a value to configure size. >> >> I am fine with either of the approaches, >> >> 1. I can split this patch into two >> i) A bool variable to enable/disable stack depot. >> ii) A config for the size. > > I still believe this is a more appropriate solution. > > Thanks in advance! > Thanks, Will work on a patch with above approach. Thanks, Vijay -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists