[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQ+DStjXJPUbUL7ggXyFj_iJuNDB56jdhzsq=D=QxgQQXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 16:59:24 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: add prototype for __add_to_page_cache_locked()
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 7:54 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:11:36PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 08:31:26AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Can we please make the eBPF code stop referencing this function instead
> > > of papering over this crap? It has no business poking into page cache
> > > internals.
> >
> > The reference from the BPF code is simply "you can inject errors here".
> > And I think we want to be able to inject errors to test the error paths,
> > no?
>
> Something that expects a symbol to be global is just pretty broken.
> I think it need to change so that whatever instrumentation is done can
> coexist with a static function.
Pls read commit description that made it global.
It has nothing to do with bpf.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists