linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 279/346] s390/smp: perform initial CPU reset also for SMT siblings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201228124933.267704720@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Dec 2020 13:49:58 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 279/346] s390/smp: perform initial CPU reset also for SMT siblings

From: Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>

commit b5e438ebd7e808d1d2435159ac4742e01a94b8da upstream.

Not resetting the SMT siblings might leave them in unpredictable
state. One of the observed problems was that the CPU timer wasn't
reset and therefore large system time values where accounted during
CPU bringup.

Cc: <stable@...nel.org> # 4.0
Fixes: 10ad34bc76dfb ("s390: add SMT support")
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/s390/kernel/smp.c |   18 +++---------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
@@ -863,24 +863,12 @@ static void smp_start_secondary(void *cp
 /* Upping and downing of CPUs */
 int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *tidle)
 {
-	struct pcpu *pcpu;
-	int base, i, rc;
+	struct pcpu *pcpu = pcpu_devices + cpu;
+	int rc;
 
-	pcpu = pcpu_devices + cpu;
 	if (pcpu->state != CPU_STATE_CONFIGURED)
 		return -EIO;
-	base = smp_get_base_cpu(cpu);
-	for (i = 0; i <= smp_cpu_mtid; i++) {
-		if (base + i < nr_cpu_ids)
-			if (cpu_online(base + i))
-				break;
-	}
-	/*
-	 * If this is the first CPU of the core to get online
-	 * do an initial CPU reset.
-	 */
-	if (i > smp_cpu_mtid &&
-	    pcpu_sigp_retry(pcpu_devices + base, SIGP_INITIAL_CPU_RESET, 0) !=
+	if (pcpu_sigp_retry(pcpu, SIGP_INITIAL_CPU_RESET, 0) !=
 	    SIGP_CC_ORDER_CODE_ACCEPTED)
 		return -EIO;