| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <A6A0ED56-9CC0-4361-BE7F-CDA7A40A9822@fb.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 05:53:47 +0000
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"jolsa@...hat.com" <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] perf-stat: enable counting events for BPF programs
> On Dec 28, 2020, at 3:43 PM, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Dec 28, 2020, at 12:11 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Em Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 09:40:53AM -0800, Song Liu escreveu:
>>> Introduce perf-stat -b option, which counts events for BPF programs, like:
>>>
>>> [root@...alhost ~]# ~/perf stat -e ref-cycles,cycles -b 254 -I 1000
>>> 1.487903822 115,200 ref-cycles
>>> 1.487903822 86,012 cycles
>>> 2.489147029 80,560 ref-cycles
>>> 2.489147029 73,784 cycles
>>> 3.490341825 60,720 ref-cycles
>>> 3.490341825 37,797 cycles
>>> 4.491540887 37,120 ref-cycles
>>> 4.491540887 31,963 cycles
>>>
>>> The example above counts cycles and ref-cycles of BPF program of id 254.
>>> This is similar to bpftool-prog-profile command, but more flexible.
>>>
>>> perf-stat -b creates per-cpu perf_event and loads fentry/fexit BPF
>>> programs (monitor-progs) to the target BPF program (target-prog). The
>>> monitor-progs read perf_event before and after the target-prog, and
>>> aggregate the difference in a BPF map. Then the user space reads data
>>> from these maps.
>>>
>>> A new struct bpf_counter is introduced to provide common interface that
>>> uses BPF programs/maps to count perf events.
>>
>> Segfaulting here:
>>
>> [root@...e ~]# bpftool prog | grep tracepoint
>> 110: tracepoint name syscall_unaugme tag 57cd311f2e27366b gpl
>> 111: tracepoint name sys_enter_conne tag 3555418ac9476139 gpl
>> 112: tracepoint name sys_enter_sendt tag bc7fcadbaf7b8145 gpl
>> 113: tracepoint name sys_enter_open tag 0e59c3ac2bea5280 gpl
>> 114: tracepoint name sys_enter_opena tag 0baf443610f59837 gpl
>> 115: tracepoint name sys_enter_renam tag 24664e4aca62d7fa gpl
>> 116: tracepoint name sys_enter_renam tag 20093e51a8634ebb gpl
>> 117: tracepoint name sys_enter tag 0bc3fc9d11754ba1 gpl
>> 118: tracepoint name sys_exit tag 29c7ae234d79bd5c gpl
>> [root@...e ~]#
>> [root@...e ~]# gdb perf
>> GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora 10.1-2.fc33
>> Reading symbols from perf...
>> (gdb) run stat -e instructions,cycles -b 113 -I 1000
>> Starting program: /root/bin/perf stat -e instructions,cycles -b 113 -I 1000
>> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
>> Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
>> libbpf: elf: skipping unrecognized data section(9) .eh_frame
>> libbpf: elf: skipping relo section(15) .rel.eh_frame for section(9) .eh_frame
>> libbpf: elf: skipping unrecognized data section(9) .eh_frame
>> libbpf: elf: skipping relo section(15) .rel.eh_frame for section(9) .eh_frame
>>
>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>> 0x000000000058d55b in bpf_program_profiler__read (evsel=0xc612c0) at util/bpf_counter.c:217
>> 217 reading_map_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.accum_readings);
>> (gdb) bt
>> #0 0x000000000058d55b in bpf_program_profiler__read (evsel=0xc612c0) at util/bpf_counter.c:217
>> #1 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>> (gdb)
>>
>> [acme@...e perf]$ clang -v |& head -2
>> clang version 11.0.0 (Fedora 11.0.0-2.fc33)
>> Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
>> [acme@...e perf]$
>>
>> Do you need any extra info?
>
> Hmm... I am not able to reproduce this. I am trying to setup an environment similar
> to fc33 (clang 11, etc.). Does this segfault every time, and on all programs?
>
I tried it on CentOS Stream release 8, with
gcc version 8.4.1 20200928 (Red Hat 8.4.1-1) (GCC)
clang version 11.0.0 (Red Hat 11.0.0-0.2.rc2.module_el8.4.0+533+50191577)
Unfortunately, I still cannot repro it.
I didn't find the issue while looking through the code. AFAICS, the code
fail over when the skeleton is not ready, so bpf_program_profiler__read()
should find a valid skeleton.
Could you please help run the test with the following patch? The patch is
also available at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/song/linux.git perf-dash-b
Thanks,
Song
diff --git i/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c w/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c
index f2cb86a40c882..e09c571365b56 100644
--- i/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c
+++ w/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c
@@ -46,8 +46,10 @@ static int bpf_program_profiler__destroy(struct evsel *evsel)
{
struct bpf_counter *counter;
- list_for_each_entry(counter, &evsel->bpf_counter_list, list)
+ list_for_each_entry(counter, &evsel->bpf_counter_list, list) {
+ pr_debug("%s counter = %lx\n", __func__, (unsigned long)counter);
bpf_prog_profiler_bpf__destroy(counter->skel);
+ }
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&evsel->bpf_counter_list);
return 0;
}
@@ -141,8 +143,14 @@ static int bpf_program_profiler_load_one(struct evsel *evsel, u32 prog_id)
counter->skel = skel;
list_add(&counter->list, &evsel->bpf_counter_list);
close(prog_fd);
+ pr_debug("%s counter = %lx\n", __func__, (unsigned long)counter);
+ pr_debug("%s skel = %lx\n", __func__, (unsigned long)skel);
+ pr_debug("%s return 0\n", __func__);
return 0;
err_out:
+ pr_debug("%s counter = %lx\n", __func__, (unsigned long)counter);
+ pr_debug("%s skel = %lx\n", __func__, (unsigned long)skel);
+ pr_debug("%s return -1\n", __func__);
free(counter);
close(prog_fd);
return -1;
@@ -214,11 +222,22 @@ static int bpf_program_profiler__read(struct evsel *evsel)
list_for_each_entry(counter, &evsel->bpf_counter_list, list) {
struct bpf_prog_profiler_bpf *skel = counter->skel;
+ pr_debug("%s counter = %lx\n", __func__, (unsigned long)counter);
+ pr_debug("%s skel = %lx\n", __func__, (unsigned long)skel);
+ if (!skel) {
+ pr_err("%s !skel\n", __func__);
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (!skel->maps.accum_readings) {
+ pr_err("%s !skel->maps.accum_readings", __func__);
+ continue;
+ }
+
reading_map_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.accum_readings);
err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(reading_map_fd, &key, values);
if (err) {
- fprintf(stderr, "failed to read value\n");
+ pr_err("failed to read value\n");
return err;
}
@@ -240,6 +259,8 @@ static int bpf_program_profiler__install_pe(struct evsel *evsel, int cpu,
list_for_each_entry(counter, &evsel->bpf_counter_list, list) {
skel = counter->skel;
+ pr_debug("%s counter = %lx\n", __func__, (unsigned long)counter);
+ pr_debug("%s skel = %lx\n", __func__, (unsigned long)skel);
ret = bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.events),
&cpu, &fd, BPF_ANY);
if (ret)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists