| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 08:52:59 +0800
From: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
To: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
CC: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3, 7/8] soc: mediatek: mmsys: Use function call for
setting mmsys ovl mout register
On Tue, 2020-12-29 at 00:38 +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> Hi, Yongqiang:
>
> Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com> 於 2020年12月28日 週一 下午4:38寫道：
> >
> > Use function call for setting mmsys ovl mout register
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/mediatek/mmsys/mtk-mmsys.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h | 3 +++
> > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mmsys/mtk-mmsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mmsys/mtk-mmsys.c
> > index dae665b..ea36a11 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mmsys/mtk-mmsys.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mmsys/mtk-mmsys.c
> > @@ -74,6 +74,17 @@ void mtk_mmsys_ddp_connect(struct device *dev,
> > reg = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + addr) | value;
> > writel_relaxed(reg, mmsys->regs + addr);
> > }
> > +
> > + if (!funcs->ovl_mout_en)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (funcs->ovl_mout_en) {
> > + value = funcs->ovl_mout_en(cur, next, &addr);
> > + if (value) {
> > + reg = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + addr) | value;
> > + writel_relaxed(reg, mmsys->regs + addr);
> > + }
> > + }
>
> mtk_mmsys_ddp_mout_en() could write register inside it rather than
> return value and write register in mtk_mmsys_ddp_connect(). So you
> could do ovl_mout_en() in mtk_mmsys_ddp_mout_en().
>
> Regards,
> Chun-Kuang.
if that, there will be many repeat code like this:
if (value) {
reg = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + addr) | value;
writel_relaxed(reg, mmsys->regs + addr);
}
>
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_mmsys_ddp_connect);
> >
> > @@ -99,6 +110,15 @@ void mtk_mmsys_ddp_disconnect(struct device *dev,
> > reg = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + addr) & ~value;
> > writel_relaxed(reg, mmsys->regs + addr);
> > }
> > +
> > + if (!funcs->ovl_mout_en)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + value = funcs->ovl_mout_en(cur, next, &addr);
> > + if (value) {
> > + reg = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + addr) & ~value;
> > + writel_relaxed(reg, mmsys->regs + addr);
> > + }
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_mmsys_ddp_disconnect);
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
> > index aa4f60e..220203d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
> > @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ struct mtk_mmsys_conn_funcs {
> > u32 (*mout_en)(enum mtk_ddp_comp_id cur,
> > enum mtk_ddp_comp_id next,
> > unsigned int *addr);
> > + u32 (*ovl_mout_en)(enum mtk_ddp_comp_id cur,
> > + enum mtk_ddp_comp_id next,
> > + unsigned int *addr);
> > u32 (*sel_in)(enum mtk_ddp_comp_id cur,
> > enum mtk_ddp_comp_id next,
> > unsigned int *addr);
> > --
> > 1.8.1.1.dirty
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-mediatek mailing list
> > Linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists