[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201229105618.GA29947@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 11:56:18 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sev-es: Fix SEV-ES OUT/IN immediate opcode vc
handling
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 03:43:06PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Eh, casting to u8 is "absolutely correct" as well. I don't like using bytes[]
> because it feels like accessing the raw data as opposed to the end result of
> decoding, but it's not a sticking point.
Ok, code in the kernel uses mostly ->value so u8 casting it is.
> Yes, insn_get_immediate() sets insn->immediate.value directly and sign extends
> the imm8 (which is correct, e.g. for "AND r/m64, imm8").
>
> switch (inat_immediate_size(insn->attr)) {
> case INAT_IMM_BYTE:
> insn->immediate.value = get_next(signed char, insn);
> insn->immediate.nbytes = 1;
Ah, there it is. And we set nbytes too, conveniently.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists