[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201229135147.23593-1-zhengyongjun3@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 21:51:47 +0800
From: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>
To: <tony@...mide.com>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] bus: ti-sysc: Use kzalloc for allocating only one thing
Use kzalloc rather than kcalloc(1,...)
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
@@
- kcalloc(1,
+ kzalloc(
...)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>
---
drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
index 92ecf1a78ec7..e39b6da64c6d 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ static int sysc_add_named_clock_from_child(struct sysc *ddata,
* limit for clk_get(). If cl ever needs to be freed, it should be done
* with clkdev_drop().
*/
- cl = kcalloc(1, sizeof(*cl), GFP_KERNEL);
+ cl = kzalloc(sizeof(*cl), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cl)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.22.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists