[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5354959b-eacb-ff77-ab3d-dc0a6c89dc9f@loongson.cn>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 08:54:34 +0800
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
Youling Tang <tangyouling@...ngson.cn>,
Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Loongson64: Give chance to build under !CONFIG_NUMA
and !CONFIG_SMP
On 12/30/2020 12:39 AM, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 10:44:23AM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>> I have tested the following three configs on the Loongson platform:
>> (1) !NUMA and !SMP,
>> (2) !NUMA and SMP,
>> (3) NUMA and SMP,
>> everything is all right.
>>
>> But there exists the following build error under NUMA and !SMP:
>>
>> CC arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.s
>> In file included from ./include/linux/gfp.h:9:0,
>> from ./include/linux/xarray.h:14,
>> from ./include/linux/radix-tree.h:19,
>> from ./include/linux/fs.h:15,
>> from ./include/linux/compat.h:17,
>> from arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.c:12:
>> ./include/linux/topology.h: In function ‘numa_node_id’:
>> ./include/linux/topology.h:119:2: error: implicit declaration of function
>> ‘cpu_logical_map’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> return cpu_to_node(raw_smp_processor_id());
>> ^
>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>> scripts/Makefile.build:117: recipe for target
>> 'arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.s' failed
>> make[1]: *** [arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
>> arch/mips/Makefile:396: recipe for target 'archprepare' failed
>> make: *** [archprepare] Error 2
>>
>> I find a patch to fix this kind of build errors [1], but it seems
>> meaningless.
>>
>> According to the NUMA and SMP description in arch/mips/Kconfig,
>> we will use only one CPU of a multiprocessor machine if !SMP,
>> on single node systems leave NUMA disabled.
>>
>> So I think there is no need to use NUMA if !SMP, and also we should
>> make NUMA depend on SMP to avoid build errors.
> ok, but compiling IP27 with your patch gives
>
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NUMA
> Depends on [n]: SYS_SUPPORTS_NUMA [=y] && SMP [=n]
> Selected by [y]:
> - SGI_IP27 [=y] && <choice>
>
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NUMA
> Depends on [n]: SYS_SUPPORTS_NUMA [=y] && SMP [=n]
> Selected by [y]:
> - SGI_IP27 [=y] && <choice>
>
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NUMA
> Depends on [n]: SYS_SUPPORTS_NUMA [=y] && SMP [=n]
> Selected by [y]:
> - SGI_IP27 [=y] && <choice>
>
> If I use "select SMP" instead both ip27 and loongson64 compile.
>
> If you are ok with this change, I'll change it while appling your
> patch.
No problem, looks good to me, thank you very much.
Thanks,
Tiezhu
>
> Thomas.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists