[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c0dfdc1-911c-a12c-c25a-e88b082acb25@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 16:27:27 +0800
From: "Li, Hao" <lihao2018.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: YANG LI <abaci-bugfix@...ux.alibaba.com>, <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
CC: <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: fix: second lock in function d_prune_aliases().
On 2020/12/30 15:01, YANG LI wrote:
> Goto statement jumping will cause lock to be executed again without
> executing unlock, placing the lock statement in front of goto
> label to fix this problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: YANG LI <abaci-bugfix@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Reported-by: Abaci <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> fs/dcache.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
> index 97e81a8..bf38446 100644
> --- a/fs/dcache.c
> +++ b/fs/dcache.c
> @@ -1050,6 +1050,6 @@ void d_prune_aliases(struct inode *inode)
> {
> struct dentry *dentry;
> -restart:
> spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
This inode lock should be released at __dentry_kill->dentry_unlink_inode.
Regards,
Hao Lee
>
> +restart:
> hlist_for_each_entry(dentry, &inode->i_dentry, d_u.d_alias) {
> spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists