linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm] mm: readahead: apply a default readahead size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <361416d6-756d-e652-224d-03b56934030a@gmx.de>
Date:   Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:05:23 +0100
From:   Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] mm: readahead: apply a default readahead size

On 12/29/20 11:55 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> No, this is wrong.  'size' in this case is the size of the read.
>> And it's zero.  Is this fixed by commit
>> 3644e2d2dda78e21edd8f5415b6d7ab03f5f54f3
>>
> Toralf, can you test with 5.11-rc1 (or later)?
>
> thanks.

My plan was to apply that commit on top of the upcoming 5.10.4 and test
that, just waiting in moment for Greg to release the stable version.

--
Toralf