lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPSr9jHa8nT=Y1R2w9v7UUFJNXhCFohwDGwyv7WOWjKADZEchw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Dec 2020 21:41:30 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <smuchun@...il.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Hui Su <sh_def@....com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: remove the static for local variable node_order

On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 8:45 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 07:40:14PM +0800, Hui Su wrote:
> > local variable node_order do not need the static here.
>
> It bloody well does.  It can be up to 2^10 entries on x86 (and larger
> on others) That's 4kB which you've now moved onto the stack.

This is not the first time I have seen similar changes. So what
do you think about adding a comment here to avoid another one
do this in the feature?

>
> Please, learn more about what you're doing.  I suggest sending patches
> to drivers/staging; that will help you learn how to submit patches to
> linux.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ