lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d2314c57-30c5-2af9-11ef-6ae1c35a9bb5@jan-o-sch.net>
Date:   Wed, 30 Dec 2020 14:36:59 +0100
From:   Jan Schlien <list.lkml@...-o-sch.net>
To:     Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [BUG] checkpatch: non-standard types cannot be declared after '}'

Hi,

I found some odd behavior of checkpatch.pl, which I'm currently using
for own projects outside the kernel, but I verified that kernel patches
can be affected as well.

Reproducer code (file test.c):
------------------>8--
void subfunc(void)
{
}

FILE *g;

int main(void)
{
        return 0;
}
------------------>8--

Checkpatch (called with extra options to only show the error to
demonstrate here):

--
$ diff -u /dev/null test.c | ./checkpatch.pl --no-tree --quiet --ignore
MISSING_SIGN_OFF,SPDX_LICENSE_TAG,COMMIT_MESSAGE
ERROR: need consistent spacing around '*' (ctx:WxV)
#8: FILE: test.c:5:
+FILE *g;
      ^

total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 10 lines checked
--

"Consistent spacing"? Checkpatch must be in the wrong mode here. When
you add another declaration ("int a;") or even an empty statement (";")
before the "FILE *g;" line the reported error vanishes.

So patching $dbg_values = 2 in the code gives:

--
6 > . }
6 > EEEE
6 >  ___


 <E> <E> <_>WS(
)
7 > .
7 > EEE
7 >  __
 FILE *g;

 <E> <E> <_>WS( )
 <E> <E> <_>IDENT(FILE)
 <E> <V> <_>WS( )
 <E> <V> <_>OPV(*)
 <E> <N> <_>IDENT(g)
 <E> <V> <_>END(;)
 <E> <E> <_>WS(
)
8 > . FILE *g;
8 > EEVVVVVNVEE
8 >  ______B___
--

I found the (not too recent) patch 3e469cdc08ac ("checkpatch: optimise
statement scanner when mid-statement") and reverting it manually solves
the issue.

Also applying the following patch fixes the error for me:

------------------>8--
@@ -3913,7 +3913,7 @@ sub process {
                        # it there is no point in retrying a statement scan
                        # until we hit end of it.
                        my $frag = $stat; $frag =~ s/;+\s*$//;
-                       if ($frag !~ /(?:{|;)/) {
+                       if ($frag !~ /(?:{|;|})/) {
 #print "skip<$line_nr_next>\n";
                                $suppress_statement = $line_nr_next;
                        }
------------------>8--

The debug output changes to:
--
6 > . }
6 > EEEE
6 >  ___


 <E> <E> <_>WS(
)
7 > .
7 > EEE
7 >  __
 FILE *g;

 <E> <E> <_>WS( )
 <E> <E> <_>DECLARE(FILE *)
 <E> <T> <_>IDENT(g)
 <E> <V> <_>END(;)
 <E> <E> <_>WS(
)
8 > . FILE *g;
8 > EETTTTTTVEE
8 >  __________
--

Note "DECLARE(FILE *)" vs. "IDENT(FILE) WS( ) OPV(*)" before.

The same behavior can be constructed after any closing brace. So any
declaration of a non-standard type after a function, branch or loop
will trigger the error. And there are quite a few non-standard types in
the kernel tree as well.

I am not sure about the optimization patch referred to earlier and if my
suggested patch is correct with respect to it. If you think it is, feel
free to commit it yourself or tell me to send a [PATCH].

Thanks,
-Jan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ