[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201230213636.GA18640@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 21:36:36 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: YANG LI <abaci-bugfix@...ux.alibaba.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: fix: second lock in function d_prune_aliases().
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 08:04:49PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 03:01:25PM +0800, YANG LI wrote:
> > Goto statement jumping will cause lock to be executed again without
> > executing unlock, placing the lock statement in front of goto
> > label to fix this problem.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: YANG LI <abaci-bugfix@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > Reported-by: Abaci <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> I am sorry, but have you even attempted to trigger that codepath?
> Just to test your patch...
>
> FWIW, the patch is completely broken. Obviously so, since you
> have dput() done just before goto restart and dput() in very
> much capable of blocking. It should never be called with spinlocks
> held. And if you look at __dentry_kill() (well, dentry_unlink_inode()
> called by __dentry_kill()), you will see that it bloody well *DOES*
> drop inode->i_lock.
Not only that, but the function is even _annotated_ to that effect.
So this 'abaci' tool you have isn't even capable of the bare minimum.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists