lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 31 Dec 2020 12:18:03 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     Alexander Dahl <post@...pocky.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Dahl <ada@...rsis.com>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, Jeff LaBundy <jeff@...undy.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: Fix schema warnings for pwm-leds

On Thu, 31 Dec 2020, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> > > > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain
> > > > naming scheme (now).  Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended
> > > > by DT project.
> > > > 
> > > >   DTC     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml
> > > >   CHECK   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml
> > > > /home/alex/build/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes: '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> > > >         From schema: /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@...pocky.de>
> > > > Acked-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@...undy.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > > 
> > > Thanks, applied.
> > 
> > Sorry, what?
> > 
> > Applied to what tree?
> 
> I took it to (local copy) of leds-next tree on. But now I realised it
> is mfd, not a LED patch, so I undone that. Sorry for the confusion.
> 
> Anyway, patch still looks good to me:
> 
> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>

Thanks Pavel.

I plan on taking this next week.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ