[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MWHPR1201MB00297BC4BB351FA85FE66A12DED60@MWHPR1201MB0029.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 12:44:19 +0000
From: Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>
To: Sia Jee Heng <jee.heng.sia@...el.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
CC: "andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com"
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 13/16] dmaengine: dw-axi-dmac: Add Intel KeemBay AxiDMA
handshake
Hi Sia Jee Heng,
see my comments inlined:
> From: Sia Jee Heng <jee.heng.sia@...el.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 07:47
> To: vkoul@...nel.org; Eugeniy Paltsev; robh+dt@...nel.org
> Cc: andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com; dmaengine@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH v8 13/16] dmaengine: dw-axi-dmac: Add Intel KeemBay AxiDMA handshake
>
> Add support for Intel KeemBay AxiDMA device handshake programming.
> Device handshake number passed in to the AxiDMA shall be written to
> the Intel KeemBay AxiDMA hardware handshake registers before DMA
> operations are started.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sia Jee Heng <jee.heng.sia@...el.com>
> ---
> .../dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c b/drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c
> index 062d27c61983..5e77eb3d040f 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-axi-dmac/dw-axi-dmac-platform.c
[snip]
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * If DW_axi_dmac sees CHx_CTL.ShadowReg_Or_LLI_Last bit of the fetched LLI
> * as 1, it understands that the current block is the final block in the
> @@ -626,6 +668,9 @@ dw_axi_dma_chan_prep_cyclic(struct dma_chan *dchan, dma_addr_t dma_addr,
> llp = hw_desc->llp;
> } while (num_periods);
>
> + if (dw_axi_dma_set_hw_channel(chan->chip, chan->hw_handshake_num, true))
> + goto err_desc_get;
> +
In this implementation 'dw_axi_dma_chan_prep_cyclic' callback will fail if
we don't have APB registers which are only specific for KeemBay.
Looking for the code of 'dw_axi_dma_chan_prep_cyclic' I don't see the reason
why it shouldn't work for vanila DW AXI DMAC without this extension. So, could
you please change this so we wouldn't reject dw_axi_dma_chan_prep_cyclic in case
of APB registers are missed.
> return vchan_tx_prep(&chan->vc, &desc->vd, flags);
>
> err_desc_get:
> @@ -684,6 +729,9 @@ dw_axi_dma_chan_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *dchan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
> llp = hw_desc->llp;
> } while (sg_len);
>
> + if (dw_axi_dma_set_hw_channel(chan->chip, chan->hw_handshake_num, true))
> + goto err_desc_get;
> +
Same here.
> return vchan_tx_prep(&chan->vc, &desc->vd, flags);
>
> err_desc_get:
> @@ -959,6 +1007,10 @@ static int dma_chan_terminate_all(struct dma_chan *dchan)
> dev_warn(dchan2dev(dchan),
> "%s failed to stop\n", axi_chan_name(chan));
>
> + if (chan->direction != DMA_MEM_TO_MEM)
> + dw_axi_dma_set_hw_channel(chan->chip,
> + chan->hw_handshake_num, false);
> +
> spin_lock_irqsave(&chan->vc.lock, flags);
>
> vchan_get_all_descriptors(&chan->vc, &head);
> --
> 2.18.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists