linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: add MTK_PMIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <160942130384.56416.5738350943602041009.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 31 Dec 2020 13:28:23 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...gle.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jiaxin Yu <jiaxin.yu@...iatek.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: add MTK_PMIC_WRAP dependency

On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 16:43:34 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Randconfig builds often show harmless warnings like
> 
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_SOC_MT6359
>   Depends on [n]: SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && MTK_PMIC_WRAP [=n]
>   Selected by [y]:
>   - SND_SOC_MT8192_MT6359_RT1015_RT5682 [=y] && SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && I2C [=y] && SND_SOC_MT8192 [=y]
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: mediatek: add MTK_PMIC_WRAP dependency
      commit: c1cbbea9c4db41eb69a831d8b07da52e05b1d1e8

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark