linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: Fix the clamping of spi->max_speed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <160942139227.56552.10180693102119888422.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 31 Dec 2020 13:29:52 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     geert@...ux-m68k.org, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
Cc:     linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Fix the clamping of spi->max_speed_hz

On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:23:21 +0200, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> If spi->controller->max_speed_hz is zero, a non-zero spi->max_speed_hz
> will be overwritten by zero. Make sure spi->controller->max_speed_hz
> is not zero when clamping spi->max_speed_hz.
> 
> Put the spi->controller->max_speed_hz non-zero check higher in the if,
> so that we avoid a superfluous init to zero when both spi->max_speed_hz
> and spi->controller->max_speed_hz are zero.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: Fix the clamping of spi->max_speed_hz
      commit: 6820e812dafb4258bc14692f686eec5bde6fba86

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark