[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201231154929.GA1846089@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 08:49:29 -0700
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@...eaurora.org>
Cc: ulf.hansson@...aro.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, wsa@...nel.org,
swboyd@...omium.org, dianders@...omium.org,
saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org, mka@...omium.org,
akashast@...eaurora.org, msavaliy@....qualcomm.com,
parashar@...eaurora.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
agross@...nel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: power: Introduce
'assigned-performance-states' property
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 04:42:08PM +0530, Roja Rani Yarubandi wrote:
> While most devices within power-domains which support performance states,
> scale the performance state dynamically, some devices might want to
> set a static/default performance state while the device is active.
> These devices typically would also run off a fixed clock and not support
> dynamically scaling the device's performance, also known as DVFS
> techniques.
>
> Add a property 'assigned-performance-states' which client devices can
> use to set this default performance state on their power-domains.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> .../bindings/power/power-domain.yaml | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
> index aed51e9dcb11..a42977a82d06 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
> @@ -66,6 +66,18 @@ properties:
> by the given provider should be subdomains of the domain specified
> by this binding.
>
> + assigned-performance-states:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
> + description:
> + Some devices might need to configure their power domains in a default
> + performance state while the device is active. These devices typcially
> + would also run off a fixed clock and not support dynamically scaling
> + the device's performance, also known as DVFS techniques. Each cell in
> + performance state value corresponds to one power domain specified as
> + part of the power-domains property. Performance state value can be an
> + opp-level inside an OPP table of the power-domain and need not match
> + with any OPP table performance state.
Couldn't this just be an additional cell in 'power-domains'?
> +
> required:
> - "#power-domain-cells"
>
> @@ -131,3 +143,40 @@ examples:
> min-residency-us = <7000>;
> };
> };
> +
> + - |
> + parent4: power-controller@...40000 {
> + compatible = "foo,power-controller";
> + reg = <0x12340000 0x1000>;
> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + parent5: power-controller@...10000 {
> + compatible = "foo,power-controller";
> + reg = <0x43210000 0x1000>;
> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> + operating-points-v2 = <&power_opp_table>;
> +
> + power_opp_table: opp-table {
> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> +
> + power_opp_low: opp1 {
> + opp-level = <16>;
> + };
> +
> + rpmpd_opp_ret: opp2 {
> + opp-level = <64>;
> + };
> +
> + rpmpd_opp_svs: opp3 {
> + opp-level = <256>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +
> + child4: consumer@...41000 {
> + compatible = "foo,consumer";
> + reg = <0x12341000 0x1000>;
> + power-domains = <&parent4>, <&parent5>;
> + assigned-performance-states = <0>, <256>;
> + };
> --
> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists