[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201231160923.GB4504@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 17:09:23 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v2] x86/kprobes: Do not decode opcode in
resume_execution()
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 11:12:05PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> @@ -467,8 +489,8 @@ static int arch_copy_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> */
> len = prepare_boost(buf, p, &insn);
>
> - /* Check whether the instruction modifies Interrupt Flag or not */
> - p->ainsn.if_modifier = is_IF_modifier(buf);
> + /* Analyze the opcode and set resume flags */
> + set_resume_flags(p, &insn);
So this function wants to be called something like analyze_insn() or so
then? set_resume_flags() is kinda misleading as a name.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists