linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: cdev: fix frame size warning in gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 3 Jan 2021 16:34:26 +0100
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: cdev: fix frame size warning in gpio_ioctl()

On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 10:37 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 5:11 PM Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > The kernel test robot reports the following warning in [1]:
> >
> >  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c: In function 'gpio_ioctl':
> >  >>drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c:1437:1: warning: the frame size of 1040 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> >
> > Refactor gpio_ioctl() to handle each ioctl in its own helper function
> > and so reduce the variables stored on the stack to those explicitly
> > required to service the ioctl at hand.
> >
> > The lineinfo_get_v1() helper handles both the GPIO_GET_LINEINFO_IOCTL
> > and GPIO_GET_LINEINFO_WATCH_IOCTL, as per the corresponding v2
> > implementation - lineinfo_get().
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202012270910.VW3qc1ER-lkp@intel.com/
> >
> > Fixes: aad955842d1c ("gpiolib: cdev: support GPIO_V2_GET_LINEINFO_IOCTL and GPIO_V2_GET_LINEINFO_WATCH_IOCTL")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
>
> That's an interesting regression.
> Anyway the kernel look better after than before the patch, so
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> Bartosz will pick patches for Torvalds this kernel cycle.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

Applied with Linus' tag, thanks!

Bart